Look at what else is on this search
Before anything about the pieces themselves, it is worth knowing what kind of search this is, because it is not the same kind as the one for dramatic or comedic monologues.
We ran nine variants and read everything that came back. Roughly half of it is not about acting at all.
A pupil with a class or festival piece due, which the school pages, the children’s writing and the teen-specific lists all point to. Somebody reading emotional writing for its own sake, which the poetry, the fan fiction and the playlist point to. And an actor early on who wants to prove they can be moved, which the video pages point to.
What we found no evidence for is the professional with a brief. Somebody with a specific audition searches by play, by period or by playing age. They do not search by feeling.
Which matters, because it explains the whole shape of what follows. A search that names a feeling rather than a form can be answered by anything, and it has been.

Sad is a result. You can only play the thing that causes it
This is the whole craft problem with the category, and across every page we read, two sentences address it.
Nobody in a play is being sad. They are refusing, bargaining, correcting somebody, holding on, or trying to make another person understand. Sadness is what the room does in response, and it is not available to you as an instruction.
You can see how badly the category needs this stated by looking at the nearest anybody comes. The largest trade title offers a rehearsal tip: perform a sad monologue as happily as you can. That is an excellent instinct with no principle behind it, and it is offered as a variation rather than as the point.
Every entry further down this page is written the second way. It is the only column that changes what you actually do in the room, and no other page on this subject has one.
Should you cry? Four say no, one disagrees, and almost nobody prints it
The category is organised around tears. One page in everything we read treats it as a craft question, and it gives it four sentences.
The people who cast are not neutral on this and they are on the record. A casting director whose credits include Mean Girls and Footloose puts it in one line: they do not expect you to cry on command like a wind-up toy, and adds that the point of the scene is not to produce tears but truth.
None of them is really arguing about tears. They are all arguing about whether you are chasing a result, and on that they are unanimous.
So the workable version is this. If it happens, let it. If it does not, do not go and get it, because the going and getting is visible from the other side of the table and it is the thing they are describing.
Two thirds of what is offered here was written by the site offering it
We counted every piece on every page by where it came from. The proportions are not what the headings promise.
Thirty-two speeches, free and legal, and what each one is doing
Public domain throughout. Shakespeare line counts and verse or prose calls are computed from marked-up text; everything else is a checked estimate.
We took every substantial grief speech in Shakespeare, tested each for death vocabulary and then for a possessive naming a relation, and sorted them. Of one hundred and eighty-five speeches, only about fourteen per cent are somebody mourning a specific named person.
Just under half never mention death at all. They are loss of a future, humiliation, exile, loneliness, ruin and regret. Malvolio is on this page and nobody has died.
The method is a word search rather than a reading, so it will miscount in both directions. But the direction holds, and it explains why the same four bereavement speeches get used to exhaustion: they are the longest and the most self-contained, so they survive being cut out of the play.
One more number from the same scan, for anyone looking for a woman’s piece. The split is roughly three male speeches to every one female, which is why Constance, Lady Percy, Paulina and Queen Katherine are worth knowing.
The Greek verse translation that actually plays is not free everywhere. Gilbert Murray’s rhyming Euripides is public domain in America and still in copyright in Britain until 2028. The unambiguously free alternatives are older and read older.
The most-linked free Chekhov is a 1998 revision. Two of the texts that come up first carry a line saying the translation was revised in 1998. The underlying translation is free and the revision is not.
Juno and the Paycock is free in America and in copyright in Britain until 2035. It holds one of the great grief speeches in the language, which is why it is not on the list above.
Working on this without it following you home
Nobody in this search says a word about it, so here is what the field actually publishes, including how thin the evidence is in places.
Start with the technique argument, because it is old and it is unresolved. Strasberg taught actors to reach a feeling through the sensory particulars of a real memory, and his own institute still teaches it, with a rule that the memory should be at least seven years old.
Two of his contemporaries rejected it outright. Stella Adler said in 1966 that going back to a feeling from one’s own experience is unhealthy, and taught imagination instead. Meisner’s own book states that emotional memory plays no role in the system he evolved.
The step-out. End the work with three slow, deep, complete breaths, then deliberately release the face and change your posture. It is small and it is a real marker.
Say your own name out loud. Not silently. Name the character you have finished being and then name yourself. It sounds absurd and it is the most reported practice in the literature.
Take the character off physically. Shake it out, or unzip it like a second skin, and leave it in the room you worked in rather than carrying it to the car.
Do the last one somewhere else. Watch the tape back in a different room from the one you recorded in, and talk about it as work rather than as what happened.
One more note on choosing. Published guidance on portraying suicide exists and it is good, from the Samaritans, from an Australian government-funded body and from the World Health Organisation. It asks makers not to attribute a death to a single cause, not to present it as release, and to keep detail of method out. Every one of those documents is written to protect the audience, and not one of them says anything about the performer. That is the half nobody has written.
Grading the sources
This page publishes a count, quotes named professionals and makes a claim about who is searching, so it owes you the method on each.
Where we differ from the standard account
What makes a monologue sad?
Commonly saidThe subject. Bereavement, heartbreak, a character in pain, described by what they feel.
What we foundSadness is what the room does. The character is doing something, and that is the only part you can rehearse.
Should the audition make them cry?
Commonly saidIt is the stated aim of several pages, including one built entirely around it.
What we foundFour named professionals say chasing tears is the error. The one who disagrees is arguing about honesty, not about tears.
Where does this material come from?
Commonly saidImplied to be plays and films, in the headings if not in the content.
What we foundTwo thirds is written by the site publishing it. One in nine is from a published stage play.
Who is searching for this?
Commonly saidAssumed to be actors, and every page is written that way.
What we foundThe results include a poetry book, a playlist and a school’s own page. It is at least three different people.
Does sad mean somebody has died?
Commonly saidEffectively yes, judging by what gets recommended.
What we foundAbout fourteen per cent of Shakespeare’s grief writing. Just under half never mentions death at all.
Is Chekhov free to use?
Commonly saidYes, and the first free text you find is treated as safe.
What we foundTwo of the most-linked free Chekhov texts are a 1998 revision carrying its own copyright.
Is there any risk in this material?
Commonly saidNot raised anywhere. No page in the search carries a note of any kind.
What we foundThirty-nine per cent of surveyed actors struggle to let go afterwards, and no union publishes guidance on it.
Is emotional recall dangerous?
Commonly saidEither that it is proven harmful, or that the concern is invented. Usually one or the other.
What we foundNeither. Real documented concern from named academics, and no controlled study either way.
So stop looking for a sad speech. Find somebody who wants something they are not going to get, work out exactly what they are doing about it in the next ninety seconds, and play that. The feeling arrives on its own or it does not arrive at all, and either way it was never the thing you were being asked to produce.