A performer standing alone on a bare theatre stage under a single working light
Home  ›  Academy  ›  The Acting Résumé  ›  Theatre
The acting résumé

Your stage combat certificate expires. All three bodies time out after three or four years, two of them tell you to put the year on your résumé, and the one that does not is the body most British actors train with.

Nobody in the résumé-advice world appears to have noticed this. An undated combat line is a claim about a certificate that may have lapsed two years ago.

Also on this page: which of the four theatre changes actually survive checking, the union programme this chapter has been recommending that closed three years ago, and how to write an understudy credit.

The short answer
A theatre résumé is not a different document. It is the same one-page casting document with the sections reordered and a handful of real content changes — and the changes are smaller and better evidenced than most guides claim. The two things on this page that will actually catch you out are a certificate with an expiry date and a union programme that no longer exists.
Rows of empty theatre seats seen from the stage of a small playhouse

It is the same document, reordered

Every guide to this promises you a different document. It is not, quite, and the honest version is more useful than the dramatic one.

You do not rebuild anything. You move the theatre block to the top, change what goes in one column, and add two lines to the header. It is a flip, not a rewrite, and it takes about ten minutes.

Why this matters more than it sounds.

Theatre is searched far more often than screen on this subject, so most people writing résumé advice are writing for the smaller audience.

Which means a theatre actor opens four film-shaped templates in a row and correctly senses that something is wrong, without being able to name it.

There are four named things. This page checks all four, and one of them does not survive.

The four changes, checked one at a time

All four came from a single trade guide. That is the shape of source this site has repeatedly caught becoming an industry standard on its own, so we went looking for second opinions.

The changeDoes anybody outside that one guide say so?
Character names for stageNot the role size
Confirmed
Two American university theatre guides say it independently, one of them spelling out the same split: the character’s name for theatre, the role type for screen. This one is solid.
The theatre, then the directorColumn three
Confirmed
Three university guides and a named New York agent, in almost identical words. Production, role, venue, director, in that order.
Union status in the headerUnder your name
Confirmed
Three independent sources put it in the header block with your name, contact and physical details. Not buried at the bottom.
Theatre credits firstReversing the screen order
Softer
Real, but several sources make it depend on what you are auditioning for rather than on the document. Put first whatever the room is casting.
Vocal range on a straight playThe surprising one
Not confirmed
Nobody outside that one guide frames it this way. Every independent source ties vocal range to whether you sing, not to whether the play is a musical.
We are keeping the vocal range line and changing the reason for it. The claim we were going to publish is that a straight-play theatre résumé wants your range where a screen one does not. We could not stand that up anywhere. What the independent sources actually say is simpler and more useful: if you sing, put your range in the header; if you sing a bit, put it under special skills. The trigger is you, not the genre. That is a smaller claim and it is the one the evidence supports.
Two performers practising a choreographed sword sequence in a rehearsal room

The certificate with an expiry date

Our research asked whether stage combat certifications lapse, could not find out, and said to check before publishing anything. We checked. They all do.

This turns out to be the most useful thing on the page, and it is not written down anywhere in the résumé-advice world. A combat certificate is not a qualification you hold for life. It runs out.

The bodyHow long it lasts, and what they tell you to write
SAFDUnited States
3 years
Their own rules: recognition “expire[s] three (3) years from issuance”, renewed by a shorter re-test. And they publish the résumé format, telling you to give the status and the year on the same line.
BASSCUnited Kingdom
3 years
Certification expires three years from the exam. They are blunt about the consequence: you may only claim qualifications achieved within the last three years, and their example line carries the year.
BADCUnited Kingdom
4 years
Four years, from their own site — and several places online say three, which is wrong. But their advice on writing it up asks only for the qualification. No year.
So the gap is specific, and it sits with one body. Two of the three tell you to date the line, because they know the certificate lapses. The third has the longest validity period and gives no instruction to date it at all, which leaves a perfectly honest actor writing an undated line about a qualification that quietly ran out. Nobody is being dishonest here. The actor is following the awarding body’s own guidance. Put the year on it anyway. If the certificate is current the year proves it, and if it has lapsed you would rather find that out at your desk than in front of a fight director.
The grammar of the line, which is the transferable part.

Awarding body, level, weapons, year. Two of the three bodies publish almost exactly this format themselves, so it is not our invention.

The weak version is the word “combat” on its own. It names no body, no level and no weapons, so nobody can act on it.

The body depends on where you are. SAFD in America. BADC or BASSC in Britain, and there is a third smaller British organisation as well.

Two details worth having. The credentials do not really travel — a British body will accept an American certificate as a reason to let you skip its beginner tier, but there is no mutual recognition and no equivalence table you can cite. And the levels are a ladder, not a pair. The British progression runs foundation, standard, intermediate, advanced, then teacher training, so “advanced” means something specific rather than meaning good.

One correction to our own draft. We were going to say the American test is judged by a Fight Master. Their own wording is that it is judged by an adjudicator, who may or may not hold that particular rank. The load-bearing fact is a different one: only certified teachers may run the test at all, so your teacher’s certification is part of what makes yours real.

The union line that stopped being true in 2023

This chapter has been telling American beginners about four possible union states. One of them closed three years ago.

The programme is EMC, the Equity Membership Candidate scheme, where you accumulated weeks of work at participating theatres towards eligibility. It is not running. Actors’ Equity phased it out when it introduced open access, and says so plainly on its own site.

What changed
The candidate programme was phased out with the introduction of open access, first announced in 2023. There is no points ladder to climb any more.
What it means if you were on it
Their position is that if you took part, you are eligible to join as soon as you are ready. The weeks you banked are not lost. The queue they were for has gone.
What to put on the résumé now
Member, or not. The interesting middle state is the other one — being in the screen union but not the stage one, which is common and worth stating rather than leaving blank.
Why we are flagging this loudlyThis is not a subtle sourcing point. It is a live instruction to chase something that does not exist. Any guide still explaining how to earn candidate points is describing a system that closed, and there are a great many of them.

British readers have a different structure and no equivalent ladder. Equity here is a trade union rather than a gatekeeper for casting, with routes in through professional work, or through graduate and student membership while you are training or just out. One honest limit: we could not reach Equity’s own website, so treat that paragraph as secondary reporting and check the detail with them directly.

What order the credits go in

The chapter established that theatre goes first and then never said how to order the theatre itself. Here is the answer, and it is not the intuitive one.

Strongest first. Not newest first. A university careers guide puts it about as bluntly as it can be put: list your most impressive credits first, and do not worry about chronological order.

The best venues and directors go at the topNot the most recent. The reader is scanning for something they recognise, and they may stop after three lines.
First
Training credits group together at the bottomMarked with an asterisk and a note. You are not hiding them, you are labelling them and moving on.
Last
No years anywhereDates reconstruct your age from a page that never states it. The one exception on this whole document is the combat line, where the year is the point.
Leave off
Too many credits? One line solves it“Additional theatre credits available upon request.” A real standing convention, and the same device as the conflicts line on a screen résumé.
Use it

That last one is worth pointing at, because a theatre actor with thirty credits usually solves the problem by shrinking the font. One page, your best work, and a line saying there is more.

How to write an understudy credit

Our research found no source on this at all and said not to publish without one. We found three, and they agree.

It is a real job and it goes on the résumé. The convention is not a separate credit line. It is a short note beside the role, and it distinguishes between covering the part and actually going on.

You covered the role

The notationu/s, beside the role name.

Why it is enoughThe job was real whether or not you went on. Covering a lead in a serious house is a credit.

You covered it and performed

The notationPerformed u/s, or u/s followed by performed.

Why it mattersIt is a materially different thing and the convention gives you a way to say so without a sentence.

You were a swing

The notationSwing, with performed added if you went on.

The general ruleHouses differ. If in doubt, ask the theatre what it prefers.

And the reason to be exact about it is the same reason that runs through this whole section. Leaving the word off is not modesty, it is the same category of move as calling background work featured. The credit is checkable in a way screen credits often are not — theatre archives are public, seasons are published, and the people who ran the building are still working. That cuts both ways. It makes a true theatre credit unusually valuable and a false one unusually easy to catch.
People waiting on chairs in a corridor outside a closed door, holding folders

Drama school credits, and the two doors

List them. Label them. And know which door they will and will not open, because that is a different question from whether they belong.

Training productions are real work and they go on the page, grouped and asterisked. The confusion comes from treating one question as two. Whether a credit belongs on your résumé and whether it counts towards a membership gate are separate matters with separate answers.

The gate, in Spotlight’s own words.

On the experience route they say they “do not accept extra/supporting artist work, stunt credits, amateur/unpaid work or productions during training courses (as credits).”

Note that this is two separate exclusions in one sentence. Amateur and unpaid work, and productions during training, are both out.

So an all-student résumé can be a completely honest document that will not, on its own, get you through that particular door.

Saying that plainly is kinder than letting somebody find out after they have paid. Different question, different bouncer. Your drama school work is genuine experience, it belongs on the page, and it is not the currency that particular gate accepts.

Theatre is where paper still survives

The printed copy is nearly dead everywhere else and it is not dead here. If any actor is going to need a stapler, it is this one.

Open theatre auditions are the one context where bringing hard copies is still described as standard. The convention is oddly precise: an eight-by-ten photograph, the résumé trimmed to match, stapled at all four corners a quarter of an inch from the edges, headshot facing up.

Worth knowing that the precision is American. No British casting source we could find describes a stapling method at all, and the two objects are different sizes here anyway — the photograph is ten by eight and the CV goes on A4. So in Britain the instruction is simply to bring clean copies and attach the photograph if you are posting anything. The thing that actually matters is having them at all, in a folder, not folded in a pocket, on the day you are standing in a corridor with forty other people.

Grading the sources

Our research opened by saying its own search underperformed, which was honest and turned out to be half right. Two of its gaps closed easily.

The claim, and where it came fromWhat we found
Combat certifications expireFlagged as unresolved, told us to ask
Primary
All three expire, and we have it from all three bodies’ own published rules. Three years, three years, four years. This was the biggest open question and it closed cleanly.
Two bodies prescribe the résumé formatNobody had noticed
Primary
Both publish an example line with the year in it. The third does not, and that is the actual gap rather than a general vagueness.
EMC is one of four union statesIn the published page
No
The programme was phased out in 2023. Actors’ Equity says so on its own site. This is a live instruction to chase something that closed.
Vocal range belongs on a straight-play résuméOne trade guide
No
No independent source frames it that way. They all tie it to whether you sing. We have changed the reason and kept the advice.
A regional theatre credit tells a director more than a film creditOur own page
No
We could not find anybody who says this. It is our own reasoning and it is plausible, so we are presenting it as an argument rather than as an industry view.
Character names, column three, union placementAll from one trade guide
Fixed
Corroborated by three university theatre guides and a named agent, independently. The single-source problem is genuinely solved for these three.
Understudy credits use u/sOur research found nothing
Good
Three sources, agreeing on the notation and on the distinction between covering and performing. The gap was closeable after all.
Strongest first, not chronologicalOnly visible in our own example
Good
Stated outright by two university guides and a named agent. Our example was teaching it silently and now the prose says it.
Spotlight excludes training and amateur workSpotlight’s own criteria
Good
Quoted verbatim and current. Both exclusions sit in a single sentence, which is worth reproducing exactly.
Theatre credits go firstOne trade guide
Softer
Real, but presented elsewhere as depending on the audition rather than the document. We have kept it and added the condition.
The screen standing orderA named coach via that same guide
Fair
She is real and well credentialled. She is also a contributor to the publication citing her, so quoting her does not escape the single-source problem.

One thing we have not solved. There is still no regional theatre casting director on this page speaking for themselves. The corroboration we found is university careers offices and one agent, which is better than a single trade guide and is not the same as a person who casts plays. That remains the weakest joint in this chapter and we would rather say so.

Where we differ from the standard account

Does a combat certificate last?

Commonly saidTreated as permanent. Listed with no date.

What we foundThree or four years depending on the body, and two of the three tell you to write the year.

How do you become eligible for the American stage union?

Commonly saidAccumulate candidate weeks at participating theatres.

What we foundThat programme was phased out in 2023 and replaced with open access.

Is a theatre résumé a different document?

Commonly saidYes, rebuild it from scratch.

What we foundNo. Same document, reordered, with a handful of real changes. Ten minutes.

Do you need vocal range on a straight play?

Commonly saidYes, theatre wants it and screen does not.

What we foundNot corroborated anywhere. The trigger is whether you sing, not what kind of play it is.

What order inside the theatre section?

Commonly saidNewest first, like a job CV.

What we foundStrongest first. One guide says outright not to worry about chronology.

How do you list an understudy?

Commonly saidUsually left off out of embarrassment.

What we foundIt goes on, marked u/s, with performed added if you went on.

Do drama school credits count?

Commonly saidEither hide them or treat them as equal.

What we foundNeither. They belong on the page, labelled, and Spotlight will not take them as a joining credit.

Do one thing tonight. Find the date on your combat certificate. If it is more than three years old you have been carrying a line that is no longer true, through nobody’s fault but a gap in what you were told. Put the year on it, and if it has lapsed, book the renewal before somebody asks you to demonstrate it.