An actor typing at a laptop with a printed page on the desk beside it
Home  ›  Academy  ›  The Acting Résumé  ›  The template
The acting résumé

Spotlight has nowhere to upload a résumé. Your credits are database fields you fill in one at a time, and only one of them is compulsory — so for most British actors this template is not a file you send anybody. It is the document you type from.

We were about to hand you a file and tell you to attach it. On the platform most British actors actually use, there is no attach button, and there never was.

Also on this page: the three-column layout that stops a screen reader working, which nobody in casting has ever mentioned; a stapling ritual that turns out to be purely American; and one of our named sources who is not what we said he was.

The short answer
Build one résumé and use it three ways. Upload it as a PDF to Backstage and Casting Networks, copy it field by field into Spotlight, and print it on A4 for the rooms that still want paper. Build it as a real table rather than with tab stops, because that single choice decides whether a screen reader can read it.
A laptop screen showing an online profile form with empty input boxes

Where your résumé actually goes

Almost every guide to this assumes one thing: that you make a file and send it. We checked the four platforms and that is true of two of them.

This matters more than a formatting tip, so we put it first. The document you build is not treated the same way by the places you submit through. On one of them it is a file. On another it is not a file at all.

The platformDoes it take an uploaded résumé?
SpotlightThe main British one
No
There is no résumé or CV upload anywhere on the profile. Credits are entered one by one into fields. Their own help pages list photographs, showreel and audio as uploads. Documents are not on the list.
BackstageAnd Mandy, same platform
Yes
A Documents section, separate from the structured credit fields. Their words: documents are “normally hidden from other users”, but “if you apply to a casting call, the Casting Director will be able to view your documents.”
Casting NetworksPDF only
Yes
You can upload “a traditional resume in PDF format”, and it appears as a link below your manually entered credits. A Word file has to be converted first.
Actors AccessBoth at once
Probably
Described consistently as a résumé tab you type into plus a PDF you can attach to a submission. We could not reach their own documentation to quote it, so we are marking this one down.
So the free template has three jobs, not one. On Backstage and Casting Networks it is a file you upload. On Spotlight it is a source document — you keep it open in one window and copy from it into the form. And on paper it is the thing you print. That is why it is worth building properly once. The alternative is what most actors do, which is to keep the information in four places and let three of them go out of date. One document, updated in one place, feeding everything else.

What Spotlight actually asks for

If the form is where your credits really live, the sensible thing is to build the document out of the same pieces the form wants.

Spotlight’s own guidance on credits is unusually relaxed about this. “The only mandatory field is the credit/production name, and other fields can be left blank.” Then it asks for more anyway: “Include as much information as possible, including your role, the production’s name, year, company and director.”

Production nameThe only field you must fill in. Everything else on this list is technically optional, which is not the same as being safe to leave out.
Required
Your roleThe character name, or the billing. This is the field where an ensemble credit quietly becomes a lead, so it is worth being accurate here.
Fill it
YearUseful to casting and awkward for you, because a run of dated credits gives away roughly when you trained.
Fill it
CompanyThe theatre, the production company, the broadcaster. This is the line that makes a credit checkable, which is a point in its favour.
Fill it
DirectorThe single most useful field on the form. A casting director reads a director’s name faster than a production title, because it tells them who has already trusted you.
Fill it

Build every credit line in your document out of those five things, in that order. Production, role, year, company, director. Then filling in the form is transcription rather than remembering, and the paper version and the uploaded version say the same thing as the profile.

How to group the credits

The commonest formatting mistake is not ugliness. It is putting everything in one block and making the reader sort it.

Marci Liroff is worth listening to here, and we should say plainly that the advice is from 2022 rather than this year. She cast E.T., Footloose and Mean Girls, and she sits on the national board of the Casting Society. Her rule is to keep the categories apart — film, television and new media as separate headings, rather than one long list of everything you have done.

Why separating them does real work.

A casting director looking for a television actor is scanning for television credits. If your best television credit is buried between two short films, they have to do the sorting you did not do.

Spotlight builds this in — the profile has headings you organise credits under, so the platform is already assuming the split.

Put the strongest category first. The order of your headings is an argument about what kind of actor you are.

One honest caveat about currency. We looked hard for a casting director or agent writing about résumé format in the last two years and found nobody. The named advice in this field is from 2022 and earlier, and everything more recent is unsigned content on résumé-builder websites. That is worth knowing when anybody tells you the rules have changed.

The commercials line, and why it is written that way

Standard practice is to write “Commercials: conflicts available upon request” and list nothing. Almost nobody explains what that sentence is protecting you from.

It is not modesty and it is not saving space. Commercial contracts create product-category exclusivity. Book a car advert and you are barred from other car adverts for as long as that one runs. Those exclusions are the conflicts.

So listing the brands works against you in a specific way. A casting director who sees a competing brand on your résumé can rule you out on the spot, without knowing whether that conflict is still live or expired years ago. They will not usually stop to ask. Holding the list back moves that check into a conversation, where the answer can be “that finished eighteen months ago.” There is a minority position that says drop the section entirely, on the grounds that heavy commercial exposure can count against you. We found that argument on several advice sites and could not attach it to a single named industry figure, so we are reporting it rather than recommending it.
A person wearing headphones listening at a computer rather than looking at the screen

The three columns that stop a screen reader working

We went looking for anybody in casting who had written about whether an actor’s résumé can be read by assistive technology. There is nothing. Not a union, not a platform, not a casting body.

Here is why that silence matters. The conventional acting résumé is three columns — role, production, director — lined up with tab stops. That looks like a table. To a computer it is not one.

What is actually happening in the file.

Tab stops and spaces are spacing instructions. They carry no information about which things belong together. The columns exist only in the eye of somebody looking at the page.

A screen reader has nothing to go on, so it reads straight across in the order the text was typed. Three unrelated columns come out as one run-on line, and the link between a role and the production it was in is gone.

A real table is different. It has header cells, so the reader can announce each row as role, then production, then director.

The accessibility term for a document that carries this structure is a tagged file. The plain-English definition comes from WebAIM, who have been the standard reference on this for two decades: “When people talk about ‘accessible’ PDF files, they are usually referring to ‘tagged’ PDF files… This information supports assistive technologies.”

And the practical step is genuinely small. Build the credits as an actual table in your word processor, with a header row, instead of lining columns up with the tab key. Then, when you export to PDF, make sure the option for document structure tags is switched on — it is not always on by default, and printing to PDF can strip the structure out entirely. That is the whole fix. It takes about five minutes and it does not change how the page looks to anybody who can see it. We are not claiming a law requires this of you. The Equality Act here and the Americans with Disabilities Act there are general duties about discrimination, and neither sets a document standard for casting submissions. We could not find a single casting organisation with a stated policy on it. That is the gap. It is not a reason to leave your résumé unreadable to a casting assistant who uses a screen reader.
A printed portrait photograph and a sheet of paper on a desk beside a stapler

The printed copy, and how much of the advice is American

There is a precise, confident ritual for attaching a résumé to a headshot. It is real, it is quoted verbatim below, and no British source we could find describes anything like it.

The American instruction is from Backstage, last updated in September 2023, and it is exact. Résumés should be cut down or printed on matching eight-by-ten paper, and then: “You should staple your headshot to your résumé on all four corners, with the staples positioned a quarter of an inch away from the photo’s edges. Staple them together with the headshot facing up, so that the staples’ pinchers are visible on the résumé side.”

Where do the staples go?

BackstageAll four corners, a quarter of an inch in.

A university theatre guide“Add staples in each of the four corners or at the top and bottom.”

What we foundA real disagreement, but a softer one than it is usually reported as. Nobody higher up has settled it, and one of the sources treats both as fine.

What about tape?

Casting Frontier, 2023Staple or carefully glue. “Avoid using tape, which may damage your photos or look unprofessional.”

What we foundVerified verbatim, and the only piece of this advice with an obvious practical reason behind it.

Now the British reality, which our research had flagged as an open question. It is not a rival stapling convention. It is that the two objects are different sizes and always were. The photograph is printed at ten by eight inches. The CV goes on A4, because that is the paper here. So the American instruction to trim your résumé to match the photo is solving a problem created by American paper. We could not find one British casting source that describes a stapling method at all. Backstage’s own British guide says only that you should attach a full-size headshot on photo-quality paper, and gives no method whatsoever. Two generic British CV sites suggested two staples at the top, but they are not casting sources and they contradict the American ritual anyway. The elaborate four-corner version is American practice, and it is fine to say so.

Does anybody still want paper? Less than they did, and not nowhere. Backstage’s British guide says plainly that “generally, actors don’t have to post their CVs now”, while noting that casting directors will often print them anyway. The exception is theatre. For open theatre auditions, and American Equity principal auditions specifically, bringing a hard copy is still described as standard.

If you do need to trim one, there is a trick worth knowing, and we will be honest about where it comes from. Left-align the text first, and you only have to make two cuts — the right edge and the bottom — instead of measuring four. That is from a low-grade advice blog rather than an industry source. It is also obviously correct, which is why it is here.

Why the general résumé websites get this wrong

We wanted to argue that generic careers advice is actively harmful to actors. Half of that argument survived contact with the evidence.

Indeed’s actor résumé guide, updated in June, really does say to include “the names of any well-known or reputable directors or professional references you have in your network.” Their own example template goes further and prints a References block, with two industry names and their personal email addresses.

The references block is wrong
No acting-specific source we checked includes one. The convention is to name the director inside the credit line itself, where it belongs. Publishing somebody’s private email as a reference, without them agreeing to field calls about you, is a different act altogether.
Tailoring per role is not wrong
We were going to call this bad advice and it is not. Casting Frontier says the same thing: different versions of your résumé for different kinds of work is normal, sensible practice. We are dropping that half of the attack.
What the difference actually isGeneric advice assumes a hiring manager who will phone your referees. Casting does not work like that. The people who can vouch for you are already named on the page, in the director column, and the person reading it very likely knows some of them.

Grading the sources

This page needed one correction to its premise and one to a named expert, which is roughly the usual rate.

The claim, and where it came fromWhat we found
Spotlight has no résumé uploadSpotlight’s own help pages
Primary
Checked against their profile and credits documentation. Photographs, showreel and audio are uploads. A résumé document is not offered at all. This reframes the page.
Backstage and Casting Networks take a fileBoth platforms’ own documentation
Primary
Quoted verbatim from each. Casting Networks is PDF only, which is the one hard format rule we can state with confidence.
The four-corner stapling instructionBackstage, updated September 2023
Primary
Verified word for word, down to the quarter of an inch and the pinchers. Our research had this exactly right.
Keep credit categories apartMarci Liroff, Backstage, July 2022
Good
Real person, real credential, real quote, and older than it is usually presented as. We have dated it on the page rather than passing it off as current.
Never use tapeCasting Frontier, July 2023
Good
Verified verbatim and dated. A content blog rather than platform policy, but a named and checkable one.
The two-cut trimming trickAn acting advice website
Weak
The quote is genuinely there. The site is an unsigned lead-generation blog with no named author, still describing photo labs as current practice. We kept the tip and labelled the source.
A casting director advises carrying spare copiesOur research
No
He is not a casting director. He is a working British actor and self-tape coach. And the line is not his — his own page credits it to another website. Two errors in one citation, so it is off the page.
Generic sites wrongly advise a résumé per roleOur research
No
Overstated. That advice is correct and an acting source gives it too. Only the references-block criticism holds up, so only that is on the page.
Reprinting wastes the trimming workOur research
No
We read the cited page in full and the sentence is not on it. Dropped rather than reworded.

Two things we deliberately did not state. We found no published file-size limit for a résumé document on any of the four platforms, so we are not inventing one. And there is no named casting voice on this subject from the past two years anywhere we could find, which we would rather report than paper over.

Where we differ from the standard account

Is your résumé a file you upload?

Commonly saidYes. Make a PDF and attach it everywhere.

What we foundOn two of four platforms. On Spotlight there is no upload at all, and the credits are database fields.

Should you use tab stops for the columns?

Commonly saidYes, that is how the layout is done.

What we foundIt destroys the document for a screen reader. Use a real table with a header row instead.

Do you staple at four corners?

Commonly saidYes, a quarter of an inch in, always.

What we foundThat is American practice. No British casting source describes any stapling method at all.

Is a British CV eight by ten or A4?

Commonly saidTreated as a paper size argument.

What we foundIt is not one. The photo is ten by eight and the CV is A4. Different objects.

Should you list your commercials?

Commonly saidWrite conflicts available on request, without saying why.

What we foundThe reason is category exclusivity. Naming brands lets somebody cut you over a conflict that expired.

Do you still need printed copies?

Commonly saidAlways carry them.

What we foundMostly not, in Britain. Theatre auditions are the live exception and they are named as such.

Are the rules changing?

Commonly saidImplied constantly by new articles.

What we foundNo named casting professional has written about résumé format since 2022. The new articles are unsigned.

Do one thing tonight. Open your résumé and check whether the columns are a real table or just tab stops, because that is a five-minute change you can make once and never think about again. Then copy the five fields into your Spotlight credits, in the same order, so the profile and the page finally agree.