An actor holding sides, listening to a note in a casting room
Home  ›  Academy  ›  Complete Acting Course  ›  Audition Technique
Chapter eight

The central skill of auditioning is not performing. It is adjusting.

And it is the one thing a self-tape structurally cannot test. You can be excellent on tape and have almost no practice at the thing the room is actually measuring — whether you can take a note and change what you are doing. This chapter is the half of auditioning the technical guides cannot teach.

Nothing here repeats the technical side. Framing, lighting, sound, readers, slating and editing are all covered properly elsewhere in the Academy, and this chapter deliberately hands off to them.

The short answer
An audition is not a performance of a scene. It is evidence-gathering — can you tell the story, can you be directed, can you be trusted on the day. The first round mostly eliminates; the callback decides. So arrive consistent, and when a note comes, make the change visible rather than cosmetic. That single behaviour is what casting remembers.

The framing everything else depends on

An audition is not a scene. It is evidence.

Almost every problem in this chapter comes from treating an audition as a performance. It is not one, and the differences are structural rather than a matter of attitude.

No contextYou are playing a fragment of a story you have not read, as a person whose arc you do not know.
No productionNo set, no costume, no lighting, no other cast — and often no scene partner worth the name.
No continuityThe scene may be from anywhere in the story, and frequently is.
A different audienceCasting is not watching as an audience. They are gathering evidence.
And it is repeatableYou may be asked to do it again, differently, immediately. No performance works like that.

Actors tend to assume casting is hunting for flaws. The casting-side account is the opposite: they are looking for evidence. Can you tell the story. Can you take direction. Do you understand tone, stakes, behaviour and the world of the project. Can they trust you to deliver under pressure.

Which changes what you are aiming at.

You are not being asked to be good. You are being asked to be legible, specific and directable. Those are the three things that predict what you will be like on the day — and the day is what they are actually buying.

The vocabulary, because it is a genuine barrier

The stages, and what each one is for.

Casting director Marci Liroff sets out four levels. They are worth knowing by name, because knowing which room you are in tells you what is being tested.

1
The general

Not an audition at all. A meeting — casting getting to know you and your work with no specific role attached. Nothing to prepare and nothing to win.

2
The pre-read

An advance reading by a casting director who does not yet know your work, before they take you to a producer or director. This is the gate, and increasingly it is a tape.

Not to be confused with a cold read, which simply means reading something you have not seen beforehand.

3
The callback, or producer session

The director and producers may be in the room — or casting may simply re-tape you with nobody else present. Liroff's instruction is specific: take in all the information and direction from the pre-read and bring it.

Off-book, connecting with your reader. And you can hold the sides — which matches the SAG-AFTRA position from chapter five.

4
The network and studio test

For series. Often four phases of pilot testing, with deals negotiated before you walk in. This is where the money and the contracts happen alongside the acting.

Two related terms sit outside that list. A screen test is now typically shot in the casting office, sometimes on two or three cameras for different angles. Casting may also pair you up in a mix-and-match arrangement with different actors, to see who has the right chemistry. A chemistry read is that same idea as its own event. Two potential co-stars perform a scene so the team can assess the dynamic between them — used most for roles that live or die on a relationship.

I rarely cast an actor from the first audition. For me, the first audition is about discovering which actors are not right for any of the roles.
Peter D. Marshall, director and directing coach — describing his own process
Which answers the question that stings: if they liked my tape, why am I being seen again for the same part?

Because the first round is largely elimination, and the decision happens later — in comparison, and in combination with other actors. Marshall's view is that for most professional directors it is the callbacks where the final choices get made.

That is not a slight and it is not indecision. It is the structure of the thing.

One note on that quotation. Marshall says “for me”, and we have kept his words rather than turning it into a claim about how all directors work. He generalises only as far as “most professional directors” on the callback point. We are not aware of a survey either way.
A casting director leaning forward to give a note across a small table

The moment the whole chapter is about. Almost nobody practises it, because a tape cannot generate one.

The half of auditioning nothing else teaches

A redirect is not a verdict. It is an invitation.

Ask actors what a redirect means and most will tell you it means they got it wrong. That reading is almost exactly backwards, and one casting coach has put the correction better than anyone.

It's as though they've been told, “You're wrong. Every instinct you have sucks. Do it this way.” When, in fact, what they've been told is, “I like you enough to ask to see you do it another way.”
Bonnie Gillespie, on the audition redirect

Her practical fix is a mindset one, and it works whether or not it happens to be true in your particular room: assume your choices were exactly right, and that the director is simply testing your directability. That assumption gets you past the flinch that keeps actors married to their first reading.

A redirect can mean several things and none of them is failure. The room may see potential and want to explore range. They may be weighing you for a different role entirely. Or they may simply want a second data point. And there is a longer-term reason it matters, which nobody mentions at the time. A director will give you adjustments on set too, and you will need to act on them there with a crew waiting. The audition redirect is a rehearsal for the job.

The three behaviours, and they are precise

Casting describes good direction-takers with unusual specificity. They listen fully. They adjust specifically. And they do not panic. What they do not do is give the same read with a cosmetic change. Nor do they throw everything out and start from zero. The target is responsiveness, and it sits between those two failures.

1

Listen all the way to the end of it

The commonest failure happens before the note has finished. You hear the first half, start building the adjustment, and miss the qualifier that was the point. Nothing you do is worth anything if you adjusted to half a sentence.

2

Rephrase the note out loud

Say it back. It focuses you, it shows the room you actually heard it, and it buys your mind and body a moment to reset. The failure mode has a shape: nodding, grunting “uh huh”, and then reading it exactly as before.

3

Make it visible

Resist being subtle about it. If they cannot see the direction in what you did, from where they are sitting, then as far as the room is concerned you did not take it. Subtlety is not the same as adjustment.

4

Adjust the adjustment

Coach Joseph Pearlman's phrase, and it is the answer to a note that makes no sense: “whatever note you get, you have to let it jive with the character you've created and 'adjust the adjustment' so that it meshes with the world you've developed.” You have a right to that freedom, and it is your job to build the bridge.

5

Justify it, in the technical sense

Notes can be blunt — more energy, speak louder, sometimes a straight line reading. Coach Denise Simon's position is that it is the actor's job to justify these notes: to find why this character might do that.

6

Let the first take go

You cannot do the new version while protecting the old one. Actors who try produce a blend that satisfies nobody. The room reads it as somebody who could not let go. The take they liked is already on the record. It does not need defending.

And that word is not a coincidence.

Justification is Stanislavski's own term from chapter seven — always try and justify what you do with your own “if” and given circumstances.

Which means taking a note is justification performed live. You are not obeying an instruction. You are supplying, on the spot, the circumstance under which that instruction becomes the only thing this person could do. It is the same skill as the whole of chapter seven, done in about four seconds.

The three kinds of redirect, decoded

Type one
“One more time. No notes.”

The ambiguous one, and it is usually about nerves — a bobble, a missed beat, focus that wandered. The room thinks you are right for it and wants you to relax into it.

What to doDo not ask for clarification. There is nothing to clarify. Just loosen up and go again.
Type two
A layered, specific note

“You are a lot more angry, and you have suffered a great deal, but you are covering it with a smile.” You are being asked to add layers, and the specifics are attached.

What to doRephrase it back, then do it visibly. This is the one where subtlety loses you the room.
Type three
A test of whether you hold on too tight

Sometimes the note exists purely to find out how flexible you are. The script and the character vision will change across the process, and they need to know you can move with it.

What to doMove. Genuinely. This is the one where being married to your first choice costs you the job.
The other reason to bring a real choice in the first place.

Pearlman again, and it is the best argument for boldness anybody has written: “Production or casting can always pull you back, and sometimes they will, but they will never pull that awesome and bold choice out of you if you don't have the courage to do it when you walked in.”

Strong is not the same as locked. Bring something. Then be willing to change it.

Two named sources, flatly contradicting each other

At the callback, do you repeat it or change it?

This is one of the most commonly asked and least answered questions in auditioning, and the sources genuinely disagree. Here is the disagreement, and then the resolution.

Repeat it

Liroff“Make sure you don't make any major changes to your reading at this point. Consistency is important.” Bring the direction you got at the pre-read, and bring it faithfully.

Gillespie“When you come in for a callback, you should always do exactly what worked to get you to that callback in the first place.” She names one exception: if you were given adjustments when you learned you had the callback.

Change it

Every redirect sourceAdaptability is what is being tested — and casting will sometimes redirect you even when they loved your first take, precisely to find out whether you can move.

PearlmanThey can always pull you back. What they cannot do is extract a choice you never brought.

DefaultDo not change it unless you are asked.
ResponseChange it completely when you are.
The reasoning is simple once it is said out loud. Casting brought you back because of something specific you did. If you arrive having reinvented it, they cannot see the thing they liked. They also cannot compare you against the other actor they are weighing you against. Consistency is what makes you assessable. But the instant a note arrives the logic reverses: they now want a different data point, and a cosmetic variation of the same read gives them nothing at all.

Read that way the two positions are not really in tension. Consistency is your default. Adjustment is your response. The actor who struggles is the one who reverses them — reinvents the reading unasked, and then cannot move when finally asked to.

How well sourced the “repeat it” half actually is. Our research brief flagged this as resting on a single casting director and asked for corroboration before building a rule on it. We found one other named casting director saying the same thing — Bonnie Gillespie, quoted above — plus an on-camera coach and an agent giving the same advice in trade press. That is enough to publish, and it is not enough to write “casting directors agree” as though it were a surveyed consensus. Two named CDs, saying it independently.

Our own argument, and we are labelling it as ours

What the self-tape quietly removed.

For most actors now the first round is a tape. That has redistributed the skills of auditioning in a way we have not seen anybody map, and it explains a problem a lot of actors are having without knowing why.

The skillIn the in-person eraIn the self-tape era
Preparation
Tested.
Tested more heavily, since you control the conditions and have no excuse.
Legibility
Frame, sound and clarity were casting's problem.
Yours — and now a gate you can fail before anyone watches your acting.
Taking direction
Tested every single time, in the first round, in ninety seconds.
Untested until much later, if at all.
Repeating without deadening
Tested at the callback.
Tested — but privately, across takes, with nobody to tell you which one died.
Recovering in front of people
Tested constantly.
Not tested at all.
Reading the room
A real and separate skill.
Removed entirely.
Look down the right-hand column. A generation of actors is arriving at callbacks with less practice at being directed than any generation before it — not through any fault of their own, but through structure. Naming that is more useful than pretending the two eras test the same things.
And the over-taping problem is the private version of the same failure.

Casting director Mike Page has said he can tell when somebody has done twenty takes, because they have ironed out all of the humanity. Arlie Day has described actors who over-rehearsed a mispronunciation until they could no longer change it.

Both are failures of flexibility — which is precisely the failure the room used to expose in the first thirty seconds, and now does not.

This section is our inference and we want to be straight about it. Everything in the table is consistent with the corpus we have read, and no source states this argument. We have not surveyed casting directors on whether they have noticed it, and if somebody did that properly it would be worth publishing on its own. Also worth saying plainly: the self-tape removed real barriers as well — geography, travel cost, a day off work, and the old requirement to live in a hub. The trade is legibility work and lost adjustment practice. Both halves are true.

Rewritten on 1 July this year, and most actors have the old version

You can ask for a live audition instead of a tape.

There is a contractual route to the one thing a self-tape cannot give you — a redirect in real time. It changed two months ago, and the change matters.

Under the 2023 SAG-AFTRA TV/Theatrical agreement, the obligation sat on the producer. They had to make available a window of time for live virtual or in-person interviews in lieu of a self-tape — scheduled at their own discretion, filled first come, first served. That was never an individual right to demand one. It was a window, with a finite number of slots.

The 2026 TV/Theatrical contracts were ratified on 4 June 2026 and took effect on 1 July. They add something genuinely new — a request-based right — and narrow it at the same time.

You can now specifically request itProducers must make good faith efforts to accommodate a performer who is invited to self-tape and who specifically requests to interview for the role virtually. Or in person, at the producer's election. Directions for how to make that request must be included in the self-tape request itself.
New
But only for certain rolesThe request right applies when casting series regulars, recurring roles, Major Role Performers, Modified Deal Performers and Modified Guest Performers. If you are up for a co-star, it does not apply to you.
Limited
And it is not a guaranteeThe contract says so in terms: casting schedules and production exigencies may not permit such opportunities to be provided to every performer. “Good faith efforts” is a real obligation and it is not the same as a right to a slot.
Not absolute
You can still just tape itNothing forces you into a live session. Performers may still submit self-tapes by preference, and for a lot of people that remains the better choice.
Your call
Why this is worth knowing even though it is hedged.

A live virtual audition gives you the one thing a tape cannot: a redirect while you are still in the room. For an actor who is better in dialogue than in isolation — and a great many are — that is a materially different opportunity. And it is now something you can ask for rather than something you hope for.

Almost nobody asks. The instructions are supposed to be in the request you already received.

A correction to our own research, and a live one. Our brief described this as “performers must be offered the option of a live virtual audition rather than a self-tape”, citing the 2023 agreement. That overstates the 2023 provision — which was a producer-scheduled, capacity-limited window, not an individual entitlement — and it is now reading from a superseded contract. The 2026 agreement runs to 30 June 2030. Contracts change and this page will age; check the current agreement or ask your representative rather than trusting any article, this one included.

A triage task, not a reading test

Cold reading, in the sixty seconds you actually have.

A cold read means performing something you have not seen beforehand. Actors treat it as a fluency test, panic accordingly, and try to read well. Fluency is not what is being assessed.

1

Two questions, thirty seconds

Who am I talking to, and what do I want from them? Per chapter seven, those are the two answers that change what you do. Everything else is refinement you do not have time for.

2

Scan for the turn

Where does the scene shift? Find that one point and you have the shape, even if you have absorbed nothing else on the page.

3

Take the page up, not your eyes down

Hold the sides high enough that a glance is a flick, not a dip. Casting has said for years that eyes searching down a page pull the viewer straight out of the scene.

4

Look, lift, deliver

Grab a line with your eyes, come up, and say it to the person. That rhythm is the whole technique. What you are avoiding is reading aloud, which is a different activity and reads as one.

5

Accept that you will stumble

You will. It does not matter. Comprehension and connection are being assessed, not smoothness — and an actor who stumbles while genuinely talking to someone beats an actor who reads perfectly at nobody.

The one thing that makes a cold read work.

Having something you want from the other person. That is the acting. Everything else on the page is reading, and reading is not the part they are watching.

Including the part that happens without you

What is actually being assessed, and what “typed out” means.

The list from the casting side is consistent enough across sources to write down as six things. A strong audition is one that gives the room usable evidence on each.

StoryCan we follow what you want, what is stopping you, and what changes? If the room cannot track those three, nothing else you did registers.
ToneDo you understand what kind of world this project lives in? Playing a comedy like a drama is not a small miss — it says you did not read it right.
ListeningAre you actually receiving the other person, or waiting? This is the one casting mentions most, and the one a tape shows most cruelly.
ChoiceDid you bring a specific point of view, or a competent neutral reading? Neutral is the most common way to be forgotten.
AdjustmentCan you take a note and change what you are doing. The entire subject of this chapter, and the one a self-tape cannot show them.
ReadinessDescribed as hard to fake and easy to recognise. Some actors have obvious talent and do not yet seem ready for the pace of the job. Others produce work that simply feels producible.

The casting director John Papsidera describes his own job as creating a space where actors can share a bit of their soul. From the same account comes the structural honesty that every actor needs and few get: a strong audition does not guarantee a booking, because somebody else in the room may have fought for a different actor.

“Typed out”, defined — and it is kinder than it sounds.

It is an industry term with a specific meaning: the elimination of an actor during auditions because of such obvious features as height, weight or age.

Which is worth knowing precisely because it is not a judgement on your audition. It happens for reasons decided before you opened your mouth. It is also the mechanism behind the casting-side line that there are a thousand reasons you did not get it — and about nine hundred and ninety-nine of them have nothing to do with you being a lesser actor.

And what happens after you leave: casting shortlists and presents options to the director and producers. On television, showrunners and network executives weigh in too. The final call usually belongs to the director and the producer. Your audition is one input into a group decision made later, largely without you in the room. That is not a reason to care less. It is a reason not to read a silence as a review.

For the actors who have only ever taped

The live room, and the virtual one.

A growing number of actors are walking into their first in-person or Zoom audition having only ever self-taped. Almost nobody writes for them.

Eyeline is harder on Zoom, not easierGet the participant window as close to the camera as you can. It takes some fiddling and it is doable — and it is the single thing that separates a call that feels like a conversation from one that does not.
Latency changes timingLeave a beat before you respond. Expect to be talked over occasionally. It is the connection, not you, and reacting to it as though it were you is what makes it awkward.
You cannot see the roomDo not read the faces. Several of them are looking at other screens, some have their cameras off, and none of it means anything about how you are doing.
Set up early, because you cannot fix it laterYour framing, lighting and sound rules do not change — but unlike a tape there is no second pass. Test the whole thing before the call, not during it.
On small talkNobody is assessing it. You are not being marked on whether you shook a hand or said something charming on the way in.
On asking questionsA genuine question about the scene is welcomed — casting directors say so repeatedly, with the caveat that your representative can ask on your behalf beforehand. Ask if you do not know something that would change what you do. Do not ask to appear thorough.

The practical close

How to get better at this when you only audition a few times a year.

You cannot learn auditioning by auditioning — there is not enough of it. So practise the specific thing the tape does not test, deliberately, when nothing is at stake.

1

Get someone to give you a note, then do it again

Not a better one. A different one. This is the whole exercise, it costs nothing, and almost nobody does it.

2

Rehearse rephrasing the note aloud

Until it is automatic and you do it without thinking. Under pressure you will do whatever you have practised, and most people have practised nodding.

3

Do a scene three ways on purpose

So that changing it stops feeling like being wrong. That association is the actual problem, and it is fixable by repetition.

4

Take a class where you are worked on live

Per chapter three, the feedback loop is the thing you are buying. It is also the only reliable substitute for a room you cannot otherwise get into.

You do not need to eliminate the nerves before you act.

That is not a nerves problem to be soothed. It is attention redirected inward by the presence of observers — which chapter one established is precisely where acting stops.

The fix is not calm. It is a target: an objective, an obstacle, and a person to do it to. And note that over-preparing is itself an anxiety response rather than a solution — it shows up in the clinical literature on audition anxiety alongside under-preparing. Trying to prevent the nerves usually makes them worse; reappraising them from something is wrong with me to this matters to me changes how your brain handles the same arousal.

Actors who adjust with confidence are remembered.
Casting Actors Cast — and the corollary is that actors who freeze disappear

The honest state of the evidence

Where the field genuinely disagrees.

Same or different at the callback?

LiroffNo major changes. Consistency is important.

The redirect sourcesAdaptability is what is being tested — sometimes even when they loved the first take.

Does a redirect mean you failed?

How it feelsLike being told every instinct you have is wrong.

What it isThey see potential, want range, or are weighing you for another role entirely.

Should you commit hard to a choice?

YesCasting says repeatedly: make strong, specific choices.

With a caveatStrong is not the same as locked. They can pull you back; they cannot pull a bold choice out of you.

Do notes have to make sense?

Just executeThe instinctive reading, and the source of a lot of bad adjustments.

Adjust the adjustmentPearlman. And Simon: it is your job to justify the note.

Is the self-tape a fair test?

Largely yesIt tests preparation and legibility well, and it removed real barriers.

IncompleteIt cannot test adjustment, recovery or directability at all. That is our inference, not a source's.

Do you have to self-tape?

It is the defaultAnd for most roles it still is.

Not alwaysUnder the 2026 SAG-AFTRA agreement you can request a live virtual interview for certain role types.

Is the first audition where you get cast?

It feels like itBecause it is the part you experience most intensely.

A directorThe first audition is about discovering who is not right. The callback decides.

What this chapter does not cover. Everything here is US and largely Los Angeles in its vocabulary — pre-reads, producer sessions, network tests. The UK process differs and a UK reader is under-served by this page as written. There is nothing on theatre auditions — monologue conventions, panels, dance calls, musical auditions — and nothing on commercial audition technique, which differs materially. Chemistry reads are thinly sourced here; we could not find a casting director speaking about how to prepare for one. And the Zoom technique above is inferred from our reader and camera research rather than from sources about virtual auditions specifically.
An actor doing a live video audition at a desk in an ordinary room

Get someone to give you a note.

Any note. On any take. Then do it again — not better, different. Make the change big enough that they can see it from where they are sitting.

That is the entire skill, it takes four minutes, and it is the one thing your last fifty self-tapes have not asked you to do once.

The technical side of the tape